Sunday, August 9, 2009

Revisiting Indo-Pak Border






8 August and an evening to spare in Firozepur! There could be nothing better than to rush to Hussainiwala border on the outskirts of the sleepy town. And that is precisely what I did, hiring a Maruti car, which raced to the border in ten minutes. How far is it from the centre of the city? ‘Barely 8 kilometres’, the driver mumbled and led me to the Martyrs’ Samadhi before I could even think about being overcharged for such a small distance. The way to the wall carrying images of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Rajguru has been laid out in red stone. It nearly burnt my soles (the shoes are taken off out of reverence!) and I wondered why no one ever had thought of spreading a mat for the visitors. There were many children who chose to splash in the water being filled up in the pond near the statues of the three martyrs whose names have become inextricably interlinked in the annals of our history. The fourth, Batukeshwar Dutt, was acquitted in the infamous Lahore trial and later died in Calcutta in 1964. Alternatively, they rushed to the green lawns below where a Samadhi in black granite stands in memory of Punjab’ Mata- Bhagat Singh’s mother in fulfilment of her last wish. ‘Have the sacrifices of such young men gone in vain’, I wondered, ‘as thoughts about the self-centred, power-hungry politicians invaded my mind. Beyond her Samadhi, there was a row of brick pillars on which Firozepur-Lahore trains used to run in good old days and made the district prosperous. Now it just highlighted the eternal divide.

A five- minute walk takes you to the gate manned by BSF who issue a small paper token allowing you to proceed. There is a notice announcing a ban on cameras, video cameras, mobile phones etc. I am carrying two of the forbidden items so check with the sentry. I am told that I can carry my mobile phone, which wouldn’t work in view of jammers installed at the border and the camera too is fine. The Notice must have been put up before they heard about Google Earth, which makes it unnecessary to shoot pictures of likely targets on the ground and no one ever thought of removing it. I walk for another ten minutes to pass through a tall arch with the four lions visible in the middle. The actual gates are just a little ahead but we are herded in to enclosures on either side- women to the left or men to the right. ‘Why this segregation?’, I felt like asking but the stern demeanour of the burly six feet plus Sikh soldier made me melt away without a whisper. There were the privileged ones who were allowed to drive right to the gate behind us and also to occupy chairs perched on our side. The commoners like me were pushed towards a stair case leading to steps behind.

The heat was unbearable and beads of perspiration kept falling from my chin. I wondered whether the BSF jawans guarding the border were made of better stuff or wore an absorbing fabric. The stands were filling up fast. The Pakistani side had lots of men in long shirts and salwars. Their women sat in a separate enclosure draped in black burqas or ethnic decorative dresses. A woman and her cameraman were shooting the entire sequence with unhindered access. They must be from PTV, I thought. Patriotic music was also being played on their side. I could not restrain myself any longer and asked the BSF officer close by why their speakers are silent. There was a shout for someone who nonchalantly replied that he did not know how to play a tape. Hope he knows how to fire a shot, I thought raising my eyebrows. Nonetheless ‘Chak de India’ did pierce through the silence a little later and I felt better.

The ceremony was a repeat of what I witnessed at Wagah and recounted in the earlier post on my blog. There was lot of stamping of feet by half a dozen men on both sides and long shouts, raising the rifle with a single hand and handing it over to the man standing next. The crowd on both sides was blatantly partial clapping for their own men and derisively laughing at the other. The presence of a couple of East Asian women with covered heads in the front row on Pakistani side and their enthusiastic support for Pakistani rangers was duly noted by the crowd.

As the Sun dipped over the horizon, the soldiers changed sides and brought the two flags down diagonally meeting for a minute at the middle. The symbolism was not lost on me but the crowd did not care and had begun to melt away. As I walked back in the twilight, I noticed barbed wire farther to my right with the flood-lit double-fencing to my left. I asked the BSF guard whether both the security rings belonged to us. He confirmed they did and we were walking between the two.

‘Don’t the Pakistanis need any barrier against us?’

‘What for? He shrugged his shoulders. ‘Who would like to go there?’
***


Saturday, June 20, 2009

Redefining BJP

The deliberations in the BJP are becoming murkier with each passing day. The knives are out and senior leaders are raising inconvenient questions. The party did not do as well as expected in the last polls and the PM-designate Advani offered to step down as leader of Opposition. This should not have come as a surprise since Advani had launched a personal campaign of vilification against PM Manmohan Singh calling him ‘weak’, ‘nikamma’ and accused him of having degraded the office as never before by taking commands from elsewhere (read Sonia Gandhi). However, he was persuaded to stay on till the organizational elections were over. The real reason seemed to be that there was no natural successor. Advani acted cleverly and appointed two persons considered close to him- Jaitley as Leader of the Opposition in the upper house and Sushma Swaraj as his deputy in the lower. It meant his continuing hold and appeasement of those wanting younger leaders to take charge to counter the emergence of Rahul and Varun Gandhis on the political horizon. This was resented by senior leaders like Jaswant Singh, Yashwant Sinha and their likes who felt that those responsible for the party’s poor showing were being rewarded. The target, Arun Jaitley, who was the chief campaigner, remained away enjoying the T 20 World Cup in London.

The opinions about BJP’s poor showing have predictably been varying. Those close to RSS feel that it happened because BJP strayed from the path of Hindutva. The senior leaders mentioned above felt that those who have never won an election (read, Jaitley) called the shots while sitting in Delhi. There were simmering voices criticising the way a negative and personal campaign was carried out by Advani and Modi, which put people off. There is yet another group, led by the party’s chief, which feels that BJP has not done badly at all with its hundred plus strength in Lok Sabha. The party spokespersons have reiterated its position that it would stick to the liberal, tolerant Hindutva as its core ideology.

There lies the problem. Most Hindus do not have a problem with Hindutva but with the brand followed by it. It is neither liberal nor tolerant. BJP has come to be identified with pulling down of Babri Masjid at Ayodhya, murderous attacks on Christian churches and missionaries in Orissa and Karnataka, moral policing resulting in assaults on women in Mangalore’s and courting couples on Valentine’s Day across the Hindi heartland. The little men and women owing allegiance to it have even tried to enforce dress codes. These acts are sometimes carried out by little known organizations which mushroom around polls and can be conveniently disowned. So Advani can condemn attacks on women, describe demolition of Babri Masjid as the saddest day of his life, praise Jinnah as a secularist and try to garner votes in the name of Hindutva at the same time. You dissociate yourself from Varun Gandhi’s communal comments and retain him as a candidate. Varun wins his seat but costs BJP many more.

To sum up, the BJP’s Hindutva has never been the tolerant, liberal, all-inclusive faith that Hindus have always prided themselves of and to which its spokespersons allude today. The party has actually brought the great faith into disrepute and disgrace by giving it a dimension akin to Islamic jihad. The trishuls distributed by it to all and sundry misrepresent the essence of Hinduism. Hinduism is all about conquering evil within ourselves. It is about freeing one of opposites in the form of pleasure and pain, success and failure, victory and defeat. It is about controlling our senses, overcoming worldly desires, managing anger lest it cause despair and loss of judgement leading to our ultimate ruin. It is about doing our karma or duty for the larger good of mankind in the name of God without worrying about results. Hinduism is a synonym of compassion and service to mankind. Let BJP return to its fold and see the difference it would make.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Justice for Aung San Suu Kyi

Aung San Suu Kyi served as the figurehead for Burma's struggle for democracy since 1988, and is one of the world's most renowned freedom fighters and advocates of non-violence. Born on June 19, 1945 to Burma's independence hero, Aung San, Suu Kyi was educated in Burma, was a student at LSR College, University of Delhi, India, and in the United Kingdom. Her father was assassinated when she was only two years old.

In 1988, she returned to Burma to nurse her dying mother, and was plunged into the nationwide uprising that had just begun. Joining the newly-forming National League for Democracy political party, Suu Kyi gave numerous speeches calling for freedom and democracy. The military regime responded to the uprising with brute force, shooting and killing up to 10,000 demonstrators – including students, women, and children – in a matter of months. Unable to maintain its grip on power, the regime was forced to call for a general election in 1990. As Suu Kyi campaigned for the NLD, she and many others were detained by the regime. Despite being held under house arrest, the NLD went on to win a staggering 82% of the seats in parliament. The regime never recognised the results.

Suu Kyi has been in and out of arrest ever since. She was held from 1989-1995, and again from 2000-2002. She was again arrested and placed behind bars in May 2003 after the Depayin massacre, during which up to 100 of her supporters were beaten to death by the regime's cronies. She moved from prison back into house arrest in late 2003 and has been held there ever since. She has won numerous international awards, including the Nobel Peace Prize, Sakharov Prize from the European Parliament, United States Presidential Medal of Freedom, and the Jawaharlal Nehru Award from India. She has called on people around the world to join the struggle for freedom in Burma, saying "Please use your liberty to promote ours."

What is neighbouring India, which boasts of being the largest democracy and the rest of the world doing to secure justice for her?

Free Aung San Suu Kyi now! Down with Myanmar’s military junta!

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Speaking Malayalam-Nursing a Job

Caught speaking Malayalam, Apollo nurses asked to resign. IE, May 26

The news report dealt with how two nurses were asked to resign when they were overheard speaking to each other in their native tongue, Malayalam. It is perfectly common for people belonging to the same community or region to break into their familiar lingo, especially in a different world. It not only gives them a sense of identity but also a collective anonymity, bordering on superiority, as others around them gape at them blankly. This need not always turn into loss of a job unless you are working for Apollo. My senior R. narrated two experiences, which were quite to the contrary.

R. had a deft hand and drew cartoons with a felicity envied by many. His favourite pastime was to ask small children to draw any line and he would turn it into a figure of their choice. S his fame spread, All India Radio hired his services to illustrate Akashvani, its official journal. He rid its contents of drabness over a period of time. As he entered its office on Delhi’s prime location, Parliament Street, to collect a cheque for the services rendered, he found himself facing a lady from his home State, Kerala. I must add here that R. had grown long hair, which were quite a rage then, and spoke chaste Hindi. His features too did not betray his roots and he was often mistaken to be from the Hindi heartland.

The lady was quite justified when she said to him, ‘Kahiye?’

‘Ji, mujhe apna cheque lena hai’, Rajan explained.

He was offered a seat and asked to wait after he had provided relevant information. Then dropped the bombshell. The lady pretended to be absorbed in work, switched to Malayalam and called out the name of a colleague seated in the same room and said to her, ‘Have you seen this joker sitting before me?’

Rajan got a jolt but composed himself and kept looking around blankly.

‘Why? What is special about him”, the other lady enquired.

‘Jesus! Look at his hair. And he must be thinking he is looking very smart”

“Why is he here?”

‘For money. But he should be given scissors in lieu of that!’

Thankfully the cheque arrived by then and Rajan signed a register to get it. Having collected it, he turned to the lady smilingly and asked in chaste Hindi, ‘Aap ko mere baal pasand nahin aaye?

The other incident was quite hilarious. On a visit to a ward in Willington Hospital in New Delhi, he discovered that the patient he was looking for was not to be found on the allotted bed. A little concerned, he rushed to the nursing station where the petite Malayali girl was on the intercom. ‘Ek minute’, she said to which Rajan responded with a nod. And then she went on uttering choicest obscenities in Malayalam, which brought beads of perspiration on R.’s forehead in winter. When she hung up after what seemed to be eternity and asked my friend, ‘Bolo’, Rajan asked gleefully about the missing patient but in Malayalam. The nurse turned pale, vanished from the scene and sent someone else to answer the query.

Better than losing a job, anyway!

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Destination Australia!

Incidents involving mugging and stabbing of Indian students in Australia, especially in Victoria, are a matter of grave concern. Many Indians have been robbed in the past but the increasing numbers of students- estimates vary between 1 to 1.5 lacs- have led to racist attacks bordering on culpable homicide to attempted murder. The frequency of vicious assaults on those who have legally sought admission there and are shelling out hefty fees averaging 2 lacs in Indian rupees have caught everyone’s attention. Routine diplomatic steps like summoning the Aussie envoy in New Delhi and phone calls by PM to his counterpart raised some hope that the matter will be resolved. However, excessive use of force by the police on Indian protestors on a sit-in shows that racism pervades even the police force there.

What should India do? India should take steps that hurt Australia. They can't make money from our students and then stab them with screwdrivers or hurl petrol bombs at them. Indian govt. should issue an advisory against travel to that country, whether for study or for tourism. Once billions of dollars, which are being earned by Australian educational and travel industry, go away, their government would understand that racism against Indians cannot be taken lightly. Banks should refuse study loans if the destination is Australia. We should derecognize Australian degrees unless those holding them clear equivalence tests here in India.

It is a pity that our students are forced to study abroad. This is largely due to reckless introduction of reservation in admissions as well as teaching. Though advocates of social justice refuse to accept it, yet merit surely takes a backseat. The admission opportunities to quality technical institutes in India must be increased. This could be done by introducing paid seats in elite institutions and the money thus raised can be used to set up more facilities here. In short, stop patronising foreign universities and improve educational infrastructure here. With stringent regulation by UGC and AITEC, it should be possible to open private universities and provide educational avenues to those who have the means to pay for them.

Sunday, May 31, 2009

Elections and After

The recent Lok Sabha elections threw up several surprises. The voters decimated several regional satraps like Lalu Prasad, Paswan, Mulayam Singh, Vaiko, Ramadoss etc and reduced the prime-ministerial ambitions of others ranging from Jayalalitha, Pawar, Navin Patnaik to Mayawati and Modi. The BJP held its fort in most States under its rule (Rajasthan excepted) but failed to make significant gains. Its orchestrated campaign to reduce the poll to a direct contest between Manmohan Singh and Advani came a cropper. Karat’s grandiose plans to hoist a Third Front and provide alternative policies remained stillborn with key allies like JD(S) hobnobbing with Congress even before the last round of polling got underway. For the Congress and its allies, the results were sweeter than expected and the comfort derived from increased numbers has raised its confidence to deal with recalcitrant allies like DMK. The formation of cabinet has been like the birth pangs experienced during a difficult delivery. There is a fusion of youth and maturity in the new Cabinet. Rahul Gandhi’s decision not to join it but devote time to rejuvenating the party disappointed those opposed to the dynastic rule.

A fortnight later, the losers remain unrepentant. BJP proclaims that the Congress is misreading the mandate. It is not an endorsement of UPA’s performance but an acceptance of bipolarity in politics implying that Congress merely gained from the rejection of Third and Fourth Fronts. It may be partly valid but does not explain why these votes did not come the BJP’s way. Such a denial mode may do more damage to the party’s prospects. Its policies and manner of discourse is clearly out of sync with youth who constitute a significant part of electorate and have different aspirations. You cannot project an eighty year old as a youth icon while younger leaders in the party remain sidelined. The claims of strong and nationalistic leadership sounded hollow once the ghost of Kandahar and Advani’s praise of Jinnah rose from the past. BJP failed to raise important issues and how it would have done things differently. The campaign remained besmirched in ‘budiya-gudiya’ small talk. No wonder the voters drifted away to those who were a ‘lesser evil’ in voters’ parlance.

The Left parties were perceived as road-blocks to progress. The voters clearly felt that they were caught in a time warp and unwilling to change ideologically with times, as China did. Their decision to vote along side BJP to pull down the govt. over the Indo-US Nuclear deal along with the violence in Nandigram and Singur dented their image considerably and wiped them out of reckoning. In retrospect, Amrtya Sen was right when he disapproved of their decision to withdraw support to UPA and suggesting that they lost their voice in the process. The election results showed that it actually happened even in their strongholds like West Bengal and Kerala. There is saying suggesting there is nothing more dangerous than an idea if it is the only one you have. The Left parties seem to have vindicated it. However, their claim that but for their opposition to unbridled financial reforms, the impact of global recession on India would have been worse is not without merit.

The ball is now in UPA’s court. The problems are aplenty. There is a strong middle class waiting for a clean, transparent and efficient government. The rural populace needs employment generation and social justice to enable it to stay at home rather than migrate to urban chaos. Lacs of cases in courts highlight the need for speedy and fair trials. Education system must be overhauled to prevent meritorious young men and women from going overseas in quest of degrees and jobs. Health care must be made available at affordable prices. The departments dealing with public are seething with corruption and need to be cleansed. Initial indications are that the new ministers have been told to perform or to perish. One hopes they would choose the former option.

Sunday, May 10, 2009

Modi-fied BJP

Narendra Modi is no longer just a poster boy for BJP. He has also acquired a larger than life image. There are umpteen stories about how the State has progressed under his rule and this is also confirmed by objective observers. He has the uncanny ability to sound sober and logical on media and in conferences while reserving his taunts and innuendos to woo and sway the masses in public meetings. No wonder he has emerged as a potential choice even for prime-minister ship once senior Advani makes way for him. His name was recently proposed by Arun Shourie and supported by the party’s spokesperson, Arun Jaitley. His success in decimating opponents within the party and without has been phenomenal and casts despair especially among Congressmen in Gujarat. During the ongoing campaign, they were found wanting on most occasions and forgot the real issues busy as they were in reacting to his salvos. Remember the frivolousness of ‘Budiya-Gudiya’ comments while serious issues remained on the backburner.

Modi’s popularity in Gujarat has been enigmatic. He allegedly acquiesced in, if not provoked, retaliatory violence against Muslims in the wake of an attack on Hindu karsevaks returning by train from Ayodhya. It resulted in the death of thousands of Muslims and destruction of their homes. The image of a tearful ex-MP Ehsan Jafri begging for life before he was killed by the rioters continues to haunt the civil society. The inaction of the State’s police was captured live by TV channels, which the independent observers found comparable to the situation prevailing during the anti-Sikh riots. Surprisingly Modi managed to turn the public anger against Muslims into political support for himself and won the next elections convincingly- a situation again comparable to Congress’ return to Lok Sabha in 1984 elections.

The Supreme Court recently instructed the SIT, on a petition filed by Jafri’s widow, to probe the role of Narendra Modi and seven of his ministers, including VHP international general secretary Pravin Togadia as also senior bureaucrats and police officers, into the communal riots in the state. It also ordered the setting up of special courts to try the accused in Gujarat. The BJP interestingly treated it as a compliment to judiciary of Gujarat since cases against rioters were transferred out of State in the past. As a result of SIT’s investigation, Maya Kodnani, a minister in Modi’s cabinet and a senior VHP functionary Jaideep Patel were recently arrested and both are cooling their heels in jail.

Modi’s ploy in Gujarat has been to confuse the issue of persecution of minorities to one of its 'asmita' or prestige of Gujaratis. So it no longer remains a Hindu-Muslim issue but becomes one of Congress-led Centre 'maligning' Guajratis. Mix it with Sonia's foreign origins and you can tongue-twist it to one of national honour. He simultaneously fuels and cashes on a sentiment that the ‘pseudo-secular Congress’ appeases Muslims and treats Hindus with contempt. Instances like delay in Afzal Guru’s execution are handpicked to support BJP’s case and give it a pro-Hindu image. The gullible voters are taken in and rarely question BJP’s record in protecting, promoting or reforming Hinduism. The only instances that come to mind are its sister organizations attacking churches and mosques, raping nuns and assaulting priests; none of which bring any glory to the Hindu faith or it followers.

BJP has always been accused, especially by the Left parties, of being fascist in character. The parallel is not entirely misplaced. Fascism is defined as a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists believe that nations and races are in perpetual conflict whereby only the strong can survive. BJP’s insistence on India being a Hindu nation, intolerance of and atrocities against minorities and emphasis on strength and security in recent polls seem to fit in with a fascist mindset. The point of deviation is the compulsion to remain within the democratic framework while promoting nationalism, anti-minorityism and anti-communism with charismatic oratory and propaganda. The term fascist, after all, has been used as a pejorative word.